|
Post by db25 on Nov 21, 2008 11:53:52 GMT -4
Michigan fan here and in such a down year for the football program it was nice to see that B-ball win last night.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Nov 21, 2008 12:13:25 GMT -4
Its November ladies.
Congrats db25! The UCLA freshmen could not handle the zone. Turnover city
Phdsims you should be able to spot a choke job better than that. Just watch the national championship game last year.
Colek thank Ohio State for me for taking over the title of Florida's bitch.
Savojah you root for a glorified Intra mural team, get back to me when WSU beats UCLA in anything besides pot smoking
|
|
|
Post by db25 on Nov 21, 2008 12:25:49 GMT -4
LOL!!
|
|
|
Post by J-Sav on Nov 21, 2008 13:32:08 GMT -4
Its November ladies. Congrats db25! The UCLA freshmen could not handle the zone. Turnover city Phdsims you should be able to spot a choke job better than that. Just watch the national championship game last year. Colek thank Ohio State for me for taking over the title of Florida's bitch. Savojah you root for a glorified Intra mural team, get back to me when WSU beats UCLA in anything besides pot smoking We beat you in alot of things Inegrity-We follow NCAA rules Realness-plastic surgery on the student body is 2% compared to 90%. Didn't you get your balls enlarged "whatever I think is hot at the time. I'm in a identity crisis, because all my teams come up short" Dominates? Pot Smoking-Yeah, we got that. Football-Yeah we sucked now, but when was the last time you were ranked in the top 5? Cade McNown days? So you can have your pre-NBA team. We'll take real college guys who don't need their mom to be put in a house, or need a new Escalade to come to Wazzu to be competitive.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Nov 21, 2008 16:56:15 GMT -4
So you can have your pre-NBA team. We'll take real college guys who don't need their mom to be put in a house, or need a new Escalade to come to Wazzu to be competitive. That's not fair. UCLA recruits don't have the same ease of transport and a roof over their heads that that Cougar players enjoy. Not everyone can live in a trailer park.
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Nov 21, 2008 20:14:00 GMT -4
Thats the joy of college basketball. Loses don't mean as much, and every team is bound to lose. UCLA will still win 23 - 27 games this season. College basketball is to good for teams to go undefeated anymore. Espicially in the big conferences. UCLA will probably lose two games in the Pac 10, but they still will be a one or two seed in the tournament. It's about what you do in March, not November.
Saying that, Michagan exploited some glarring Bruin weakness. I hope teams took some notes from the way Michagan defended them.
|
|
|
Post by J-Sav on Nov 21, 2008 20:45:18 GMT -4
I know I'm changing the subject, Sims touched on a point. That's why college football would be so much better with an 8 team playoff. The argument against the playoff system is that the games would not mean as much any more. But I beg to differ. Sims said that every team is bound to lose, and that's very true in college football too. I think it's very hard to go undefeated in college football, and to have one loss disqualify you from winning a championship is bs. Even with the playoff system, that's still only 8 out of 119 teams, which means that losses in the season are still crucial, because that still won't guarantee you a spot in the 8. And think of the non-BCS conferences. They still have to go undefeated to even be considered. But teams like USC and Penn State should be able to still have a chance at a National Championship, because it's very hard to go undefeated, especially in conferences like the Pac and SEC. So stop this injustice now, because to me, college football is boring except a couple good matchups, alot of games are less meaningless, because only 4 teams have a legit shot at a title, when with a playoff system, you have alot more interest in the games, because alot more teams have a shot at a title, and makes the games mean more.
That's why I love college basketball. Every team has a legit chance to win a title. Maybe not a realistic chance, but a chance to win it all, and you always have different matchups in the final 4, and not the same 5-6 teams that you see in the nat'l championship game in football. George Mason wouldn't had been in the final 4 if they did it like college. And having 65 spots to fill for the tournament makes alot of games more interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Dec 18, 2008 22:27:36 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by J-Sav on Dec 19, 2008 0:32:18 GMT -4
Who cares.
One TE won't change USC dominance over you guys.
Great season Neuweisel lol.
Yes, the Cougs suck, so nothing more you can say.
UCLA dominates as much as De La Hoya dominated his last fight.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Dec 19, 2008 1:15:58 GMT -4
Who cares. One TE won't change USC dominance over you guys. Great season Neuweisel lol. Yes, the Cougs suck, so nothing more you can say. UCLA dominates as much as De La Hoya dominated his last fight. De La Hoya is a businessman. He absolutely did dominate. He made tens of millions of dollars fooling enough idiots that he wouldnt be the same washed up fighter that has shown up in the ring the last few years if he matched up against a smaller fighter. Not only that but hes also the official promoter for Pacquiao's next fight. He will be pulling more bank off of Pacquiao partly because of the hype he now has for beating a washed up boxer. Like usual your bottom of the barrel education fails you when it comes to the big picture. Neuheisal stealing away a top recruit from USC is more meaningful to the program than a who gives a shit bowl victory.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Feb 4, 2009 18:54:22 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Seattle Slough on Feb 4, 2009 19:07:18 GMT -4
I would just like to say, Of thos3 104 players were drafted, how many of them were busts? Obviously the more older guys drafted in the early years were most likely solid, but what about now? At best a lot of role players, or guys that disappeared.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Feb 4, 2009 19:22:42 GMT -4
I would just like to say, Of thos3 104 players were drafted, how many of them were busts? Obviously the more older guys drafted in the early years were most likely solid, but what about now? At best a lot of role players, or guys that disappeared. The guys pictured are players coached by Howland. The Lavin recruits outside of Ariza are scrubs but they were not drafted high so i dont know how you can call them busts. Farmar, Afflalo, Westbrook, Moute and Love and all seem to be playing well given their draft position. Historically most are probably nobodies but the same could be said of every college team that sends talent to the NBA. Most draft classes are made up a few stars, a few role players and bunch of guys that will fight to even make the tam.
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Feb 4, 2009 19:31:32 GMT -4
SEC had a great recruiting season. Bama, and LSU have great futures. Pac 10 did ok, but I think top to bottom, the Pac 10 is in trouble. I do like what Stanford has done, and SC is always one of the best, and UCLA looks good. Outside of that, it looks like a bunch of sub par classes when you compare to the rest of the Nation.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Feb 4, 2009 20:10:53 GMT -4
SEC had a great recruiting season. Bama, and LSU have great futures. Pac 10 did ok, but I think top to bottom, the Pac 10 is in trouble. I do like what Stanford has done, and SC is always one of the best, and UCLA looks good. Outside of that, it looks like a bunch of sub par classes when you compare to the rest of the Nation. Scout has the PAC 10 as the 2nd best conference today. Are looking at Rivals? Im pretty sure espn owns them and since fox sports own tv rights for the PAC 10 we often get ignored or underrated.
|
|