|
Post by flying daggers on Oct 23, 2004 14:40:37 GMT -4
Yeah, but that's what the research from Cambridge says. Or so Kings claim. EDIT: Just realized it was Kings who posted the original post, and not Knicks.
|
|
|
Post by sativa417 on Oct 23, 2004 15:29:32 GMT -4
I read the original post as if it was written normal the first time I saw it. Had problems with Heat's though.
|
|
DSP2489
Ball Boy
SLOX - Hornets & SLOZ - Hawks & SLOC - Syracuse & SLOB - Yankees
Posts: 46
|
Post by DSP2489 on Oct 23, 2004 15:31:09 GMT -4
yea the original is real easy....but the heat's one was harder i agree
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2004 16:26:20 GMT -4
I think they mean normal sentenses, not fucked up sentenses that have unneeded longer words. Who uses alphabets when they're talking about letters? c'mon
|
|
|
Post by rjstew94 on Oct 23, 2004 16:29:41 GMT -4
The Kings post seemed like a normal post in this league.
|
|
|
Post by flying daggers on Oct 23, 2004 16:34:02 GMT -4
I think they mean normal sentenses, not fucked up sentenses... How are my sentenses fucked up? Care to elaborate? Who uses alphabets when they're talking about letters? c'mon Lots of people do, actually. And the research did not specify that it can only apply to short, monosyllabic words. Here's a translation of what I wrote: It doesnt matter how terribly arranged the other alphabets are? That research was either inconclusive, or just blatantly inaccurate. Maybe even plain bullcrap. Cambridge, my posterior. It was difficult understanding what I was attempting to write here, dont you think?
|
|
|
Post by flying daggers on Oct 23, 2004 16:37:45 GMT -4
Looking at it in normal form, is it "fucked up" like you claimed? No, it's perfectly comprehensible. If you think alphabet and posterior are "difficult" words. . . well, the next president of the USA had better take a good look at the American education system. What makes my post look "fucked up" is the way the alphabets in the middle are arranged.
|
|
|
Post by sativa417 on Oct 23, 2004 18:15:34 GMT -4
do you argue with walls?
|
|
|
Post by jamesbrown on Oct 24, 2004 6:18:31 GMT -4
Damn the Heats taking the fun out of it......but using more complicated words does mess things up. Part of the reason it works is because we usually know what words to expect. When you use dumbass "college talk" it throws everyone off.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 24, 2004 12:34:57 GMT -4
Damn the Heats taking the fun out of it......but using more complicated words does mess things up. Part of the reason it works is because we usually know what words to expect. When you use dumbass "college talk" it throws everyone off. collge talk?! shit i'm in college and I don't go around talking about alphabets and posteriors
|
|
|
Post by knicksfan2k4 on Oct 24, 2004 12:50:14 GMT -4
y DID U THINK IT WAS MY POST AND I AGREE THAT THE WAY KNIGS DID IT WAS EASIER U GOT CARRIED AWAY
|
|
|
Post by flying daggers on Oct 24, 2004 18:45:20 GMT -4
If they can argue back, yeah.
|
|
|
Post by FUCK GATOR MONTH!! O H!! on Oct 24, 2004 18:52:20 GMT -4
y DID U THINK IT WAS MY POST AND I AGREE THAT THE WAY KNIGS DID IT WAS EASIER U GOT CARRIED AWAY hahahaha we all thought it was you ;D
|
|