|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 0:37:38 GMT -4
Choose carefully...
|
|
|
Post by kfilament on Mar 28, 2009 1:03:48 GMT -4
jesus chirst....this guy really never quits....
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Mar 28, 2009 1:58:55 GMT -4
lol, I picked UCLA. I based it off of all the Pre Season hype, then they turned around and got embarassed in the Pac 10 tournament, then get smashed in the Tourney. For having such top recruiting classes, they didn't play well.
BTW guys leaving early is no excuse, because you can look at Kansas and how they still did really well this season
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 2:29:21 GMT -4
lol, I picked UCLA. I based it off of all the Pre Season hype, then they turned around and got embarassed in the Pac 10 tournament, then get smashed in the Tourney. For having such top recruiting classes, they didn't play well. BTW guys leaving early is no excuse, because you can look at Kansas and how they still did really well this season Kevin Love > Russell Westbrook> Luc Richard Mbah a Moute = Mario Chalmers > Brandon Rush > Darrell Arthur The last team to lose comparable talent to the NBA the same year was Florida and they have yet to return to the tournament Next year's team is going to be ridiculously young. If Jrue stays there will be 5 freshman and 5 sophomores playing the large majority of minutes. I wont be surprised if they are one and done next year but the following two years they should primed for another championship run.
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Mar 28, 2009 3:47:43 GMT -4
lol, I picked UCLA. I based it off of all the Pre Season hype, then they turned around and got embarassed in the Pac 10 tournament, then get smashed in the Tourney. For having such top recruiting classes, they didn't play well. BTW guys leaving early is no excuse, because you can look at Kansas and how they still did really well this season Kevin Love > Russell Westbrook> Luc Richard Mbah a Moute = Mario Chalmers > Brandon Rush > Darrell Arthur The last team to lose comparable talent to the NBA the same year was Florida and they have yet to return to the tournament Next year's team is going to be ridiculously young. If Jrue stays there will be 5 freshman and 5 sophomores playing the large majority of minutes. I wont be surprised if they are one and done next year but the following two years they should primed for another championship run. Lol you guys still have like 6 all americans on your team. It's UCLA, there is no such thing as losing by 20 in the first rounds of the tourney. For what UCLA represents, that is a horrible loss. Not saying you guys won't be nice, just saying for UCLA's tradition, a 20 point early tournament loss is unacceptable for what UCLA is. It's not hating, just more so saying that UCLA is rich in tradition, and that blowout loss is embarassing for a great program
|
|
|
Post by c_kriz on Mar 28, 2009 17:41:36 GMT -4
Why is Wake Forest losing to my boys from Cleveland State not on here? For sure the most humiliating loss...
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 18:26:40 GMT -4
Why is Wake Forest losing to my boys from Cleveland State not on here? For sure the most humiliating loss... Because I don't know of any Wake Forest fans on this board.
|
|
|
Post by Mogwai Mode on Mar 28, 2009 19:28:45 GMT -4
How is the Washington game embarrassing? I voted for UCLA.
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 20:12:54 GMT -4
How is the Washington game embarrassing? I voted for UCLA. PAC 10 champion getting eliminated in the second round by a lower seed isn't embarrassing? Its not like they had to play Villinova on the road or something...
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Mar 28, 2009 20:47:45 GMT -4
How is the Washington game embarrassing? I voted for UCLA. PAC 10 champion getting eliminated in the second round by a lower seed isn't embarrassing? Its not like they had to play Villinova on the road or something... LOL, how is that loss embarrasing? They loss by two, to a good team. Your logic is retarded. Wasn't like they loss by 20................................. UCLA
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 21:01:27 GMT -4
PAC 10 champion getting eliminated in the second round by a lower seed isn't embarrassing? Its not like they had to play Villinova on the road or something... LOL, how is that loss embarrasing? They loss by two, to a good team. Your logic is retarded. Wasn't like they loss by 20................................. UCLA That reminds me of the skit... Come on man. The PAC 10 Champion should muster better than a 2nd round knockout. That goes for any year. I dont understand why you think that somehow is out of line. Our conference's best team shouldn't be expected to be among the top 16 in the nation every year?
|
|
|
Post by Beast Mode (lilsims) on Mar 28, 2009 21:33:38 GMT -4
lol, LOSING TO A 5 SEED WHEN YOUR 4? I could understand if UW was a 1 -2 seed, but they weren't. Nobody said UW was the best in the country, just the best in the Pac 10. As you said before " The Pac 10 had a down year" So yes, I didn't have to high of hopes for a young UW team
|
|
|
Post by Kobe Dominates! on Mar 28, 2009 22:01:11 GMT -4
lol, LOSING TO A 5 SEED WHEN YOUR 4? I could understand if UW was a 1 -2 seed, but they weren't. Nobody said UW was the best in the country, just the best in the Pac 10. As you said before " The Pac 10 had a down year" So yes, I didn't have to high of hopes for a young UW team So a 4 seed losing to a 5 seed is no big deal, but a 6 seed losing to a 3 seed on its home court is is embarrassing. Gotcha. I guess Ill be embarrassed along with the Pittsburgh and Duke fans that our 6 seeded squad couldn't get the job done.
|
|
|
Post by Mogwai Mode on Mar 28, 2009 22:16:24 GMT -4
lol, LOSING TO A 5 SEED WHEN YOUR 4? I could understand if UW was a 1 -2 seed, but they weren't. Nobody said UW was the best in the country, just the best in the Pac 10. As you said before " The Pac 10 had a down year" So yes, I didn't have to high of hopes for a young UW team So a 4 seed losing to a 5 seed is no big deal, but a 6 seed losing to a 3 seed on its home court is is embarrassing. Gotcha. I guess Ill be embarrassed along with the Pittsburgh and Duke fans that our 6 seeded squad couldn't get the job done. It's not about the seeding as much as it's about the point differential. A 2 point loss is equivalent to 1 basket. Meaning that game could have gone either way. Washington should have won, but no one, anywhere, in the history of time has ever referred to a 2 point loss as a humiliating loss. In the history of time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2009 22:51:00 GMT -4
How is the Washington game embarrassing? It's not. What's embarrassing is that it's even an option on this poll.
|
|